I wrote the following two reviews a few months ago for another publication. These are the first time I've made them available online.

You may have felt that the idea of
people killing each other on a secluded island (or in the desolate
woods, etc.) for sport is a concept much played out in recent times.
Surely not a year goes by without kids, prison inmates, or aliens
being used to carry out the task. The Hunger Games is no more
offensive than the rest: set in one of those post-apocalyptic
environments where the poor are selected to battle each other while
television cameras record their every throat-slashing – think Roman
gladiators without the analog – two children from each of the
twelve designated ghetto districts, one male and one female, are
chosen to compete in the annual Hunger Games, where only one person
can be declared the victor. Our lead characters, Katniss and Peeta,
are the unlucky folk from District 12 selected (well, Katniss
volunteers as a substitute for her sister), and before long, they are
trained to be natural born killers. That we never get to intimately
know the other kids competing, essentially turning them into stock
villain characters, is one of the film's many faults.
I could go on to describe how, through
the implication of sponsorships, certain participants can gain the
upper hand in the competition, or, thanks to the panopticon nature of
the show, the director of the proceedings can throw an increasing
numbers of obstacles in their way (giant dog-like creatures, forest
fires), but why bother? It's all just diversions meant to slow down
the inevitable tidy outcome; since there are two sequels to go, the
final five minutes of the film juggle between optimism and pessimism
like an Orwellian, Truman Show mishmash, never sure how to
wrap up a story that still has a lot more to go.
That the characterization of our noble
heroine Katniss is regarded as a role model for young girls is
interesting given the way she is beautified up when off the
battlefield and ultra-maternalized while on. In times of murder and
chaos, why stop to share mocking jay whistles with the competition?
And without giving anything away, the winner of The
Hunger Games serves as both a sexually progressive and
sexually restrictive view of modern times. 75 years running and we
are still dependent on the opposite sex for survival? I guess
familiarity breeds ratings.

Obviously low-budget, 4:44 Last Day
on Earth works nonetheless as intimate urbanized drama, well
acted by its leading man Willem Dafoe as the one tortured soul who
doesn't seem at peace with what's to come. Cisco keeps a journal of
the impending events, realizing of course that they will be of no use
tomorrow, and his need to make peace with his daughter and ex-lover
(who he left to shack up with the much younger Skye) helps viewers
identify with his plight. When he later wrestles with getting high or
staying clean for the global disaster, we sympathize with him – he
is advised not to take the drugs, but when you're scheduled to perish
tomorrow, addiction isn't something you're going to have to worry
much about. Similarly when the couple decides to have unprotected
sex, Ferrara humorously has us contemplate the consequences. If Skye
becomes impregnated and they knowingly die in the morning, will Rick
Santorum label her a baby-killing liberal? Or if she uses protection,
will Rush Limbaugh call her a slut? Decisions, decisions.
Running a short but draggy eighty
minutes, it would be ironic to call Ferrara's far-reaching film one
in which nothing much happens, but what you see is what you get. It's
all run up with no payoff. Cisco later takes a stroll after a lovers'
quarrel to visit some buddies, and one gets the sense that Ferrara is
trying desperately to open up the spatial limitations of his movie.
He even tries to go expansive, using real stock and archival footage
(from, among other sources, Al Jazeera) edited in to show the world
in both chaotic turmoil and peaceful tranquility. Some of it drills
the point home – the Charlie Rose and NY1 footage, for example –
while other moments feel too clustered and imposing. Still, there is
something to be said about a visualist who uses found footage to
paint our future damnation with familiar imagery.
Its parts better than its whole, 4:44
Last Day on Earth is as optimistic a movie about the end of the
world as we are going to get. It reaffirms and reassures that when
man's back is up against the wall, he will make peace with his fellow
brethren. Love makes the world go round and it remains a presence
when it stops. The Chinese delivery man? Cisco gives him something
better than money as payment in his final hours: he proves him with
an outlet to Skype home. Although not a film for everyone, Ferrara
focuses less on science than on humanity, and makes good sociological
points. Out strolling the streets, Cisco sees a down-on-her-luck
prostitute looking for work. Even at the very end, we are desperate
for human interaction to help us contextualize our dead-end
predicament.
No comments:
Post a Comment